
Apache Corporation Company Cyber Security Posture
apacorp.comOur primary product is energy, and where there is reliable, affordable energy, people are healthier, have access to better education, and are given greater opportunities to elevate their families to higher standards of living. Apache Corporation is a subsidiary of APA Corporation.
Apache Corporation Company Details
apache-corporation
2987 employees
253988.0
211
Oil and Gas
apacorp.com
Scan still pending
APA_1855314
In-progress

Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

Apache Corporation Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Apache Corporation Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apache | Vulnerability | 25 | 1 | 5/2025 | APA136052625 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: A critical path equivalence vulnerability in Apache Tomcat, designated CVE-2025-24813, has been actively exploited in the wild following the public release of proof-of-concept exploit code. The vulnerability, disclosed on March 10, 2025, enables unauthenticated remote code execution under specific server configurations and affects millions of Java-based web applications worldwide. Security researchers have confirmed active exploitation attempts shortly after the vulnerabilityโs disclosure, with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) adding it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on April 1, 2025. | |||||||
Apache2 | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 6/2025 | APA813061325 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: A critical zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053) in WebDAV implementations allows remote code execution. Advanced persistent threat (APT) groups have actively exploited this vulnerability in targeted campaigns against enterprise networks. The exploit uses malicious URL shortcut files combined with WebDAV server configurations to gain initial access and move laterally within compromised environments. This vulnerability is particularly effective against environments running Apache2 with WebDAV modules enabled, often lacking adequate access controls. Security researchers have observed APT groups distributing these weaponized shortcuts through phishing campaigns disguised as legitimate business documents. |
Apache Corporation Company Subsidiaries

Our primary product is energy, and where there is reliable, affordable energy, people are healthier, have access to better education, and are given greater opportunities to elevate their families to higher standards of living. Apache Corporation is a subsidiary of APA Corporation.
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
Apache Corporation Cyber Security News
Patch Alert: Critical Apache Struts Flaw Found, Exploitation Attempts Detected
Threat actors are attempting to exploit a recently disclosed security flaw impacting Apache Struts that could pave the way for remote codeย ...
Dirty DAG: New Vulnerabilities in Azure Data Factoryโs Apache Airflow Integration
Unit 42 researchers have discovered new security vulnerabilities in the Azure Data Factory Apache Airflow integration.
Cybersecurity Weekly Recap: Key Updates on Attacks, Vulnerabilities, & Data Breaches
This edition highlights emerging threats and the shifting dynamics of digital defenses. Key topics include advanced ransomware attacks.
Apache HertzBeat Vulnerability Let Attackers Exfiltrate Sensitive Data
A recently discovered vulnerability in Apache HertzBeat, an open-source real-time monitoring tool, has raised concerns about potential dataย ...
Apache Corporation Tree Grant Program Opens U.S. Applications for 2025-2026 Planting Season
The program is open to U.S.-based nonprofit organizations and government agencies in Texas and Louisiana. Grant recipients must request aย ...
Deloitte internal communications allegedly leaked, firm says client data currently safe
Major consulting firm Deloitte says there is no sign that client data is at risk after an infamous threat actor claimed to have exfiltratedย ...
What Is Apache Log4J (Log4Shell) Vulnerability?
Log4Shell is a Java Naming and Directory Interfaceโข (JNDI) injection vulnerability which can allow remote code execution (RCE). By including untrusted data (ย ...
Log4j Forever Changed What (Some) Cyber Pros Think About OSS
Log4Shell is no longer a massive, widespread danger. Still, researchers warn that the vulnerability is still present in far too many systems.
Apache Struts vulnerability lets hackers execute malicious code on corporate servers
Apache Struts, an open-source framework for developing Java web applications, was discovered to have a remote code execution vulnerability.

Apache Corporation Similar Companies

Ukrnafta
โรญโโโยต โยฑโรฑโยชโรฅโร โยต 70 โรโรฆโโซโรฑโโค ยฌยดUkrnaftaยฌยช โรฎ โโฆโโโฯโยฑโรฑโยชโรฅโร โรฆโรฉ โโฆโโโรโรโรฆโโฅโโโโโรฆโโคโโโยฅโรฆโยฑโรโโคโโฆโรฆโรฉ โโซโรฆโยบโรธโโโโฆโรฑโรฎโรฉ โยฃโโซโรโโโรณโโฆโโ, โโค โร โโซโยชโโโยฅโรฑ โรจโโซโรฆโรณ โรธโยตโรโยตโยฑโรโโคโโโรฉโรโรฅ 1791 โโฆโโโรโรโรฆโโคโโโร โรโโ 147 โโฅโโโโโรฆโโคโโโร โร โโคโยตโรโยฅโยชโรฆโโคโโโโฆ, โโ โรโโโโซโรฆโโ โยฑโรฑโยชโรฅโร โยต 500 โยบโรฆโโฆโรฆ

Repsol
At Repsol, we are at the forefront of the energy sector to build the future of energy with innovation and sustainability. We are a strong multienergy company that creates value in an integrated, diversified, and sustainable way to promote progress in society. We leverage our past experience to be pr

GVK
GVK is a leading Indian conglomerate with presence across energy, transportation, hospitality and life sciences sectors. GVK set up Indiaโs first independent power plant and has around 1700 MW projects under generation and operation. It is the first company in India to develop a six-lane road proje

PETRONAS
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) is a leading global energy company committed to powering societyโs progress in a responsible and sustainable manner. With close to 50,000 employees and a global reach spanning over 100 countries, we are ranked among the worldโs largest corporations by revenue in

Indian Oil Corp Limited
As India's flagship national oil company in the downstream petroleum sector, IndianOil has been fuelling the energy demands of India for over five decades. With a 33,000-plus work-force, extensive refining, distribution & marketing infrastructure and advanced R&D facilities, lndianOil plays a signif

Galnaftogaz
ะะะข ยซะะพะฝัะตัะฝ ะะฐะปะฝะฐััะพะณะฐะทยป ะผะตัะตะถะฐ ะะะ ยซะะะะยป โ ะพะดะธะฝ ะท ะปัะดะตััะฒ ะฝะฐ ัะธะฝะบั ะฝะฐััะพัััะตะนะปั ะฒ ะฃะบัะฐัะฝั. ะะธ ะทะฐะนะผะฐัะผะพัั ัะพัะณัะฒะปะตั ะฝะฐััะพะฟัะพะดัะบัะฐะผะธ, ะตะบัะฟะตััะธะทะพั ัะบะพััั ะฟะฐะปัะฝะพะณะพ, ะผะฐัะผะพ ะฝะฐะนะฑัะปััั ะฒ ะฃะบัะฐัะฝั ะผะตัะตะถั ะทะฐะบะปะฐะดัะฒ ั ะฐัััะฒะฐะฝะฝั ั ะดะพัะพะทั ัะฐ ะผะฐะณะฐะทะธะฝะธ ะท ัะธัะพะบะธะผ ะฐัะพััะธะผะตะฝัะพะผ ัะพะฒะฐััะฒ ะฝะฐ ะะะ. ะฉะพะดะฝั ัะธัััั ัะบัะฐัะฝััะฒ

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Apache Corporation CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Apache Corporation has faced 2 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Vulnerability'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Our primary product is energy, and where there is reliable, affordable energy, people are healthier, have access to better education, and are given greater opportunities to elevate their families to higher standards of living. Apache Corporation is a subsidiary of APA Corporation..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Vulnerability'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
