Comparison Overview

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

VS

Elevance Health

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

55, Boulevard Diderot, Paris, 75012, FR
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799

AP-HP (Greater Paris University Hospitals) is a European world-renowned university hospital. Its 39 hospitals treat 8 million people every year: in consultation, emergency, during scheduled or home hospitalizations. The AP-HP provides a public health service for everyone, 24 hours a day. This mission is a duty as well as a great source of pride. AP-HP is the leading employer in the Greater Paris area: 100.000 staff members – doctors, researchers, paramedical staff, administrative personnel and workers – work there.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 37,495
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Elevance Health

220 Virginia Ave, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46204
Last Update: 2026-03-28

Fueled by our bold purpose to improve the health of humanity, we are transforming from a traditional health benefits organization into a lifetime trusted health partner. Our nearly 100,000 associates serve more than 118 million people, at every stage of health. We address a full range of needs with an integrated whole health approach, powered by industry-leading capabilities and a digital platform for health. We believe that improving health for everyone is possible. It begins by redefining health, reimagining the health system, and strengthening our communities.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 42,858
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ap-hp.jpeg
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elevance-health.jpeg
Elevance Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Elevance Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elevance Health in 2026.

Incident History — Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Elevance Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elevance Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ap-hp.jpeg
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elevance-health.jpeg
Elevance Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Elevance Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Elevance Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has not reported any.

In the current year, Elevance Health company and Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Elevance Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Elevance Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Elevance Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company nor Elevance Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Elevance Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company.

Elevance Health company employs more people globally than Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP nor Elevance Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N