Anta Company Cyber Security Posture
anta.comANTA Group was founded in 1991 and officially launched the ANTA brand in 1994. It is a comprehensive sportswear company specializing in the design, production, marketing and operation of sportswear, accessories and other sports equipment. Over more than 28 years of development, ANTA has transformed from a traditional private company into a public company that is able to compete internationally and has a modern corporate governance structure, as well as the largest sportswear conglomerate in China. In 2019, ANTA Group entered into "the coordination and value year" with the goal of achieving over 100 billion Yuan of its turnover by 2025 and becoming a respected world-class multi-brand sportswear conglomerate. In 2016, ANTA Group determined the development strategy of "Single-Focus, Multi-Brand and Omni-Channel". In March 2019, ANTA Group announced it has initially realized the acquisition of Amer Sports, a Finnish company. In 2018, ANTA Group achieved a revenue of 24.1 billion Yuan, a turnover of more than 40 billion Yuan and an annual sales of over 70 million pairs of sports shoes and over 100 million pieces of clothing. By August 2018, ANTA's market value had exceeded HK$ 120 billion, ranking the third of the world in the industry. By the first half of 2018, ANTA had paid taxes of over 20 billion Yuan and created more than 100,000 jobs directly and more than 200,000 jobs indirectly.
Anta Company Details
anta
10,001+ employees
27109
339
Sporting Goods Manufacturing
anta.com
Scan still pending
ANT_1160760
In-progress
Anta Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Anta Global Score.png)
Anta Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Anta Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Anta Company Subsidiaries
ANTA Group was founded in 1991 and officially launched the ANTA brand in 1994. It is a comprehensive sportswear company specializing in the design, production, marketing and operation of sportswear, accessories and other sports equipment. Over more than 28 years of development, ANTA has transformed from a traditional private company into a public company that is able to compete internationally and has a modern corporate governance structure, as well as the largest sportswear conglomerate in China. In 2019, ANTA Group entered into "the coordination and value year" with the goal of achieving over 100 billion Yuan of its turnover by 2025 and becoming a respected world-class multi-brand sportswear conglomerate. In 2016, ANTA Group determined the development strategy of "Single-Focus, Multi-Brand and Omni-Channel". In March 2019, ANTA Group announced it has initially realized the acquisition of Amer Sports, a Finnish company. In 2018, ANTA Group achieved a revenue of 24.1 billion Yuan, a turnover of more than 40 billion Yuan and an annual sales of over 70 million pairs of sports shoes and over 100 million pieces of clothing. By August 2018, ANTA's market value had exceeded HK$ 120 billion, ranking the third of the world in the industry. By the first half of 2018, ANTA had paid taxes of over 20 billion Yuan and created more than 100,000 jobs directly and more than 200,000 jobs indirectly.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Anta Cyber Security News
Is Palo Alto Networks Stock Outperforming the S&P 500?
With a market cap of $129.9 billion, the company offers firewalls that identify and control applications, scan content to stop threats, prevent ...
In it to win it: Understanding cyber policy through a simulated crisis
The Cyber 9/12 Strategy Challenge challenges students to engage in crisis management and develop strategies to bolster cyber resilience.
Anta buys German outdoor apparel brand Jack Wolfskin for $290 million
It has sold the brand to Chinese sportswear giant Anta Sports Products Ltd (Anta) for the reported sum of $290 million/€256 million.
Kyrie Irving’s Anta shoes see surge in demand after Nike split
Getting mired in a scandal and dumped by Nike Inc. hasn't stood in the way of NBA star Kyrie Irving remaining a presence in the shoe market.
Grade Fraud Scandal at UCAD: A criminal network dismantled
According to the newspaper Libération, he manipulated student grades after exams in exchange for bribes or sexual favors from female students.
The best policies come from the streets, not just boardroom – Former Finance Minister
The best policies come from the streets, not just boardroom – Former Finance Minister · New fuel levy looms as Finance Minister submits request ...
How Nationalism in China Has Dethroned Nike, Adidas
Nike and Adidas, which said they would not use Xinjiang cotton, were sent on a downward trajectory in sales that has not yet bottomed out.
New cybersecurity project in West Africa
The goal is to allow the best students at the partnering universities in West Africa to participate in cybersecurity PhD programs in Luxembourg.
Anta Sports apparel maker seeks international M&A
Anta reported first-half profit increased 17 percent to 1.13 billion yuan ($170 million), exceeding analysts' expectations of 1.11 billion yuan.
Anta Similar Companies
DECATHLON FRANCE
We are the world's Largest sports retailer. Founded in 1976, in France, we have set about making the pleasure and benefit of sports available for everyone across the globe. We do that by providing world class products at extremely affordable prices for all participants, from enthusiastic beginners
PT Nikomas Gemilang
Pou Chen Corporation was founded in Taiwan in September 1969 by Tsai family, initially produced canvas and rubber footwear. Thereafter, Pou Chen focused on athletic and casual footwear manufacturing, and has also expanded into brand (such as Nike, Adidas, Puma, Converse, Asics, New Balance) licensee
Fusheng Precision Company
Fusheng Precision Company, formally the Sporting Goods Division of Fusheng Industrial Company, is the largest contract manufacturer of golf club equipment. We proudly supply our goods and services, including titanium drivers, stainless steel irons and metal woods, graphite shafts and club assembly,
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Anta CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Anta has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Anta has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as ANTA Group was founded in 1991 and officially launched the ANTA brand in 1994. It is a comprehensive sportswear company specializing in the design, production, marketing and operation of sportswear, accessories and other sports equipment. Over more than 28 years of development, ANTA has transformed from a traditional private company into a public company that is able to compete internationally and has a modern corporate governance structure, as well as the largest sportswear conglomerate in China. In 2019, ANTA Group entered into "the coordination and value year" with the goal of achieving over 100 billion Yuan of its turnover by 2025 and becoming a respected world-class multi-brand sportswear conglomerate. In 2016, ANTA Group determined the development strategy of "Single-Focus, Multi-Brand and Omni-Channel". In March 2019, ANTA Group announced it has initially realized the acquisition of Amer Sports, a Finnish company. In 2018, ANTA Group achieved a revenue of 24.1 billion Yuan, a turnover of more than 40 billion Yuan and an annual sales of over 70 million pairs of sports shoes and over 100 million pieces of clothing. By August 2018, ANTA's market value had exceeded HK$ 120 billion, ranking the third of the world in the industry. By the first half of 2018, ANTA had paid taxes of over 20 billion Yuan and created more than 100,000 jobs directly and more than 200,000 jobs indirectly..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
