Comparison Overview

Anglo American

VS

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Anglo American

17 Charterhouse Street, London, EC1N 6RA, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 800 and 849

Anglo American is a leading global mining company and our products are the essential ingredients in almost every aspect of modern life. Our portfolio of world-class competitive operations, with a broad range of future development options, provides many of the future-enabling metals and minerals for a cleaner, greener, more sustainable world and that meet the fast growing every day demands of billions of consumers. With our people at the heart of our business, we use innovative practices and the latest technologies to discover new resources and to mine, process, move and market our products to our customers – safely and sustainably.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 26,527
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 800 and 849

Jindal Steel is one of India’s foremost integrated steel producers, renowned for its scale, efficiency, and commitment to excellence. Operating on a robust mine-to-metal model, the Company leverages captive resources, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and a global distribution network to deliver high-performance steel solutions. With an investment footprint exceeding USD 12 billion, Jindal Steel runs state-of-the-art facilities in Angul, Raigarh, and Patratu, and maintains strategic operations across India and Africa. Its diversified and future-ready product portfolio underpins core sectors such as infrastructure, construction, and manufacturing, powering progress through strength and sustainability. Take the next step in your career with Jindal Steel by submitting your application to our Talent Acquisition team at "[email protected]"

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 19,633
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anglo-american.jpeg
Anglo American
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindalsteel-ltd..jpeg
Jindal Steel Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anglo American
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jindal Steel Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anglo American in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel Ltd. in 2026.

Incident History — Anglo American (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anglo American cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jindal Steel Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jindal Steel Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anglo-american.jpeg
Anglo American
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jindalsteel-ltd..jpeg
Jindal Steel Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anglo American company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jindal Steel Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anglo American company.

In the current year, Jindal Steel Ltd. company and Anglo American company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. company nor Anglo American company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. company nor Anglo American company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jindal Steel Ltd. company nor Anglo American company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anglo American company nor Jindal Steel Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Anglo American company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jindal Steel Ltd. company.

Anglo American company employs more people globally than Jindal Steel Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anglo American nor Jindal Steel Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H