Comparison Overview

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

VS

Burns & McDonnell

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Avª das Nações Unidas 12495, São Paulo, 04578-000, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-01

Fundada em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, a Andrade Gutierrez tem reconhecida expertise no segmento de construção pesada. Na década de 1990 iniciou a diversificação dos negócios com investimentos nas áreas de Concessões e Telecomunicações. Hoje o Grupo Andrade Gutierrez é um dos maiores conglomerados de infraestrutura na América Latina e acumula projetos realizados em mais de 40 países. Participa como investidora em empresas como Oi e Contax (AG Telecom), CCR, Sanepar, e Cemig (AG Investimentos). AG Jovem: www.agjovem.com.br Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AndradeGutierrezSA Twitter: https://twitter.com/Grupo_AG Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/AndradeGutierrez

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 11,448
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Burns & McDonnell

9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenges, constantly working to make the world an amazing place. Each professional brings an ownership mentality to projects at our 100% employee-owned firm, which has safety performance among the top 5% of AEC firms. As dedicated owners, we work through challenges until they’re resolved, meeting or exceeding our clients’ goals. We apply this commitment to our communities, too. We live and work in the same cities you call home, so we share a passion to keep them strong and healthy. From fundraising events and community cleanups to educational outreach and mentorship — especially when it comes to sharing our passion for STEM — our professionals work to make our communities thrive.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 15,385
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrade-gutierrez.jpeg
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burns-mcdonnell.jpeg
Burns & McDonnell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burns & McDonnell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andrade Gutierrez S.A. in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.

Incident History — Andrade Gutierrez S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andrade Gutierrez S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrade-gutierrez.jpeg
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burns-mcdonnell.jpeg
Burns & McDonnell
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burns & McDonnell company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Burns & McDonnell company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company.

In the current year, Burns & McDonnell company and Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burns & McDonnell company nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company nor Burns & McDonnell company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Burns & McDonnell company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company.

Burns & McDonnell company employs more people globally than Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. nor Burns & McDonnell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H