Comparison Overview

alnamic AG (now Avanade)

VS

LexisNexis

alnamic AG (now Avanade)

Habichtweg 21, 41468, Neuss, DE
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Alnamic is pleased to announce that it was acquired by Avanade on April 1st, 2020. Avanade is the leading provider of innovative digital and cloud services, business solutions, and design-led experiences delivered through the power of people and the Microsoft ecosystem. Learn more at www.avanade.com. Die alnamic AG wurde zum 01.04.2020 in die Avanade Deutschland GmbH integriert. Informationen über die Avanade Deutschland GmbH finden Sie hier: https://www.linkedin.com/company/avanadedach/

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LexisNexis

230 Park Avenue, New York City, 10017, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01

LexisNexis is a leading innovator of private, secure, and authoritative Legal AI solutions that help legal and business professionals draft full documents with ease, make informed decisions faster, and deliver outstanding work and improved outcomes, all powered by trusted content. LexisNexis Legal & Professional serves customers in more than 150 countries with 11,800 employees worldwide, and is part of RELX, a global provider of information-based analytics and decision tools for professional and business customers.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,705
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alnamic-ag.jpeg
alnamic AG (now Avanade)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexisnexis.jpeg
LexisNexis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
alnamic AG (now Avanade)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LexisNexis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for alnamic AG (now Avanade) in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

LexisNexis has 21.95% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — alnamic AG (now Avanade) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

alnamic AG (now Avanade) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alnamic-ag.jpeg
alnamic AG (now Avanade)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexisnexis.jpeg
LexisNexis
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of unpatched vulnerability (React2Shell)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of unpatched React2Shell vulnerability in frontend application
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched Vulnerability (React2Shell)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

alnamic AG (now Avanade) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LexisNexis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LexisNexis company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has not reported any.

In the current year, LexisNexis company has reported more cyber incidents than alnamic AG (now Avanade) company.

Neither LexisNexis company nor alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

LexisNexis company has disclosed at least one data breach, while alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LexisNexis company nor alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) company nor LexisNexis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LexisNexis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to alnamic AG (now Avanade) company.

LexisNexis company employs more people globally than alnamic AG (now Avanade) company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor LexisNexis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H