Comparison Overview

alnamic AG (now Avanade)

VS

DXC Technology

alnamic AG (now Avanade)

Habichtweg 21, 41468, Neuss, DE
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Alnamic is pleased to announce that it was acquired by Avanade on April 1st, 2020. Avanade is the leading provider of innovative digital and cloud services, business solutions, and design-led experiences delivered through the power of people and the Microsoft ecosystem. Learn more at www.avanade.com. Die alnamic AG wurde zum 01.04.2020 in die Avanade Deutschland GmbH integriert. Informationen über die Avanade Deutschland GmbH finden Sie hier: https://www.linkedin.com/company/avanadedach/

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DXC Technology

20408 Bashan Dr, Ashburn, 20147, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799

DXC Technology helps global companies run their mission-critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. The world's largest companies and public sector organizations trust DXC to deploy services to drive new levels of performance, competitiveness, and customer experience across their IT estates. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dxctechnology Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/DXCTechnology TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dxc_technology

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 89,953
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alnamic-ag.jpeg
alnamic AG (now Avanade)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxctechnology.jpeg
DXC Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
alnamic AG (now Avanade)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DXC Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for alnamic AG (now Avanade) in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DXC Technology in 2026.

Incident History — alnamic AG (now Avanade) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

alnamic AG (now Avanade) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DXC Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DXC Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alnamic-ag.jpeg
alnamic AG (now Avanade)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dxctechnology.jpeg
DXC Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

alnamic AG (now Avanade) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DXC Technology company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DXC Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to alnamic AG (now Avanade) company.

In the current year, DXC Technology company and alnamic AG (now Avanade) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DXC Technology company nor alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DXC Technology company nor alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DXC Technology company nor alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) company nor DXC Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

alnamic AG (now Avanade) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DXC Technology company.

DXC Technology company employs more people globally than alnamic AG (now Avanade) company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither alnamic AG (now Avanade) nor DXC Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H