Comparison Overview

ALEC Holdings

VS

Bouygues Group

ALEC Holdings

Marina Walk, 3601 - Marina Plaza, Dubai Marina, Dubai, U.A.E., Dubai, Dubai, AE, PO Box 27639
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alec.ae

ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, and aesthetics. ALEC Holdings offers its clients complete turnkey solutions in construction, MEP, fit-out, marine, oil & gas, modular construction, energy efficiency and solar projects, heavy equipment rental, technology systems, data centers and asset maintenance. With these capabilities, the company successfully serves a diverse range of sectors including airports, retail, hotels & resorts, high-rise buildings, and themed projects.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 11,125
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bouygues Group

32, Avenue Hoche, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bouygues.com/

Founded in 1952 by Francis Bouygues, Bouygues is a diversified services group operating in over 80 countries with 200,000 employees all working to make life better every day. Its business activities in construction (Bouygues Construction, Bouygues Immobilier, Colas); energies & services (Equans); media (TF1) and telecoms (Bouygues Telecom) are able to drive growth since they all satisfy constantly changing and essential needs.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 47,064
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues.jpeg
Bouygues Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ALEC Holdings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bouygues Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Group in 2026.

Incident History — ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bouygues Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bouygues.jpeg
Bouygues Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ALEC Holdings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bouygues Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bouygues Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ALEC Holdings company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bouygues Group company and ALEC Holdings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bouygues Group company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bouygues Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ALEC Holdings company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bouygues Group company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor Bouygues Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ALEC Holdings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bouygues Group company.

Bouygues Group company employs more people globally than ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Bouygues Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References