Comparison Overview

Airbus

VS

Embraer

Airbus

BP 90112, Blagnac Cedex, FR, 31703
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.airbus.com

Airbus pioneers sustainable aerospace for a safe and united world. The Company constantly innovates to provide efficient and technologically-advanced solutions in aerospace, defence, and connected services. In commercial aircraft, Airbus designs and manufactures modern and fuel-efficient airliners and associated services. Airbus is also a European leader in space systems, defence and security. In helicopters, Airbus provides efficient civil and military rotorcraft solutions and services worldwide.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 84,573
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Embraer

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170, São José dos Campos, 12227-901, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
https://embraer.com/global/en

A global aerospace company headquartered in Brazil, Embraer has businesses in Commercial and Executive Aviation, Defense & Security, and Agricultural Aviation. The company designs, develops, manufactures and markets aircraft and systems, providing Services and Support to customer after-sales. Since it was founded in 1969, Embraer has delivered more than 8,000 aircraft. On average, about every 10 seconds an aircraft manufactured by Embraer takes off somewhere in the world, transporting over 145 million passengers a year.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 24,241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbusgroup.jpeg
Airbus
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Airbus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Embraer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airbus in 2026.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Embraer in 2026.

Incident History — Airbus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Embraer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Embraer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbusgroup.jpeg
Airbus
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Improper handling of null bytes in the Wing FTP Server’s web interface
Motivation: Gain complete control over the system
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Airbus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Embraer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Airbus and Embraer have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Embraer company and Airbus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Embraer company nor Airbus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Embraer company nor Airbus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Embraer company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Airbus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Airbus company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Embraer company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Airbus company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Embraer company.

Airbus company employs more people globally than Embraer company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Airbus nor Embraer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References