Comparison Overview

AeC

VS

Iron Mountain

AeC

Rua Espírito Santo, 871 - Bairro Centro, Belo Horizonte, 30160-031, BR
Last Update: 2026-03-22
Between 750 and 799

A AeC é apontada consistentemente como a líder brasileira na entrega de soluções de experiência do cliente e gestão de processos terceirizados. Servindo as principais marcas do mercado nacional, conquistou nos três últimos anos a posição de Empresa do Ano de BPO pela conceituada Frost and Sullivan. Líder também nas práticas de ESG, recebe há oito anos consecutivos o título de Melhor Empresa de Serviços pelo Prêmio Época Negócios 360°. Com um olhar inovador, o seu diferencial está no modo como integra o cuidado com as pessoas e aplica tecnologia de ponta em seus processos, como inteligência artificial, robotic process automation, serviços em nuvem e ferramentas de analytics e segurança. Atualmente, a AeC conta com mais de 52 mil colaboradores em 20 unidades distribuídas por sete estados do país. É certificada pelo instituto Great Place to Work como uma das melhores empresas para se trabalhar. Com uma combinação única de Tecnologia e Calor Humano, a mais de 30 anos de história conquistando, apenas no último ano, 27 importantes prêmios e reconhecimentos do mercado. Venha evoluir conosco! Entre em contato com a gente através do e-mail: [email protected]

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 34,614
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Iron Mountain

33 Arch St, Boston, 02110, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 800 and 849

In the era of AI, your data is your advantage. Yet too often it remains untapped: disconnected from systems, underutilized, untrained, and exposed to risk. Iron Mountain is the trusted partner for organizations of all sizes to unlock what’s possible, transforming information into intelligence and assets into advantage. How? By seamlessly managing digital and physical assets of all kinds across their lifecycle—making them visible, secure, accessible, and AI-ready. From payments to pathology, mortgages to media, fine art to IT, we’ve helped more than 240,000 customers around the world, including 95% of the Fortune 1000, unlock more value from what’s already within reach. All with unparalleled security, governance, and sustainability at every step. What can we unlock together?

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 23,332
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aec.jpeg
AeC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-mountain.jpeg
Iron Mountain
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AeC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Iron Mountain
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AeC in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iron Mountain in 2026.

Incident History — AeC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AeC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Iron Mountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iron Mountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aec.jpeg
AeC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iron-mountain.jpeg
Iron Mountain
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Iron Mountain company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AeC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Iron Mountain company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AeC company.

In the current year, Iron Mountain company and AeC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Iron Mountain company nor AeC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Iron Mountain company nor AeC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Iron Mountain company nor AeC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AeC company nor Iron Mountain company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Iron Mountain company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AeC company.

AeC company employs more people globally than Iron Mountain company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AeC nor Iron Mountain holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A flaw has been found in wandb OpenUI up to 1.0. This affects the function create_share/get_share of the file backend/openui/server.py of the component HTMLAnnotator Component. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to HTML injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in QDOCS Smart School Management System up to 7.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/enquiry of the component Admission Enquiry Module. Performing a manipulation of the argument Note results in cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The Ultimate Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.2. This is due to the '{usermeta:password_reset_link}' template tag being processed within post content via the '[um_loggedin]' shortcode, which generates a valid password reset token for the currently logged-in user viewing the page. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to craft a malicious pending post that, when previewed by an Administrator, generates a password reset token for the Administrator and exfiltrates it to an attacker-controlled server, leading to full account takeover.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

LibJWT is a C JSON Web Token Library. Starting in version 3.0.0 and prior to version 3.3.0, the JWK parsing for RSA-PSS did not protect against a NULL value when expecting to parse JSON string values. A specially crafted JWK file could exploit this behavior by using integers in places where the code expected a string. This was fixed in v3.3.0. A workaround is available. Users importing keys through a JWK file should not do so from untrusted sources. Use the `jwk2key` tool to check for validity of a JWK file. Likewise, if possible, do not use JWK files with RSA-PSS keys.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Starting in version 2.0.39 and prior to version 3.0.25, a prototype pollution vulnerability exists in the `parse_str` function of the npm package locutus. An attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` by overriding `RegExp.prototype.test` and then passing a crafted query string to `parse_str`, bypassing the prototype pollution guard. This vulnerability stems from an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-25521. The CVE-2026-25521 patch replaced the `String.prototype.includes()`-based guard with a `RegExp.prototype.test()`-based guard. However, `RegExp.prototype.test` is itself a writable prototype method that can be overridden, making the new guard bypassable in the same way as the original — trading one hijackable built-in for another. Version 3.0.25 contains an updated fix.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X