Comparison Overview

Kiefer Aquatics

VS

Sportringen

Kiefer Aquatics

903 Morrissey Dr, Bloomington, Illinois, US, 61701
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.kiefer.com

Kiefer Aquatics is the leading multi-channel distributor serving lifeguards, swim teams, swim facilities, and learn to swim programs in the U.S. market. Our portfolio of e-commerce and retail locations operate under our various brands and businesses which include: Kiefer, The Lifeguard Store, All-American Swim and Swim Shops of the Southwest. If you are interested in working at Kiefer and are passionate about swimming and serving customers, we'd like to talk to you. Please email us as [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Sportringen

Vevgatan, Borås, SE
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sportringen.se

SPORTRINGEN - en del av SGN Sport - består av drygt 50 fria sporthandlare som samlat sig under ett och samma namn. Alla Sportringens butiker ägs och drivs av hängivna entreprenörer med ett stort intresse för sport, och varje butik har sitt egna utvalda och unika produktsortiment. SPORTRINGEN är en del av SGN Sport där även Team Sportia och Bike Nation ingår. Totalt inom SGN Sport, Sverige finns 232 sport-, cykel- och fritidsbutiker spridda över hela landet.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adolph-kiefer-&-associates.jpeg
Kiefer Aquatics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sportringen.jpeg
Sportringen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kiefer Aquatics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sportringen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kiefer Aquatics in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sportringen in 2026.

Incident History — Kiefer Aquatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kiefer Aquatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sportringen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sportringen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adolph-kiefer-&-associates.jpeg
Kiefer Aquatics
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: External System Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sportringen.jpeg
Sportringen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sportringen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kiefer Aquatics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kiefer Aquatics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sportringen company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sportringen company and Kiefer Aquatics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sportringen company nor Kiefer Aquatics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Kiefer Aquatics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Sportringen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kiefer Aquatics company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sportringen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics company nor Sportringen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics company nor Sportringen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sportringen company employs more people globally than Kiefer Aquatics company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kiefer Aquatics nor Sportringen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References