Comparison Overview

adidas

VS

Archery Trade Association

adidas

World of Sports, Adi-Dassler-Strasse 1, Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, DE, 91074
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 600 and 649

Inspired by our heritage, our brand is rooted in sports and the culture born from it. Headquartered in Herzogenaurach, Germany, we’re a global leader in the sporting goods industry, employing 62,035 worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 89,336
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Archery Trade Association

15 S Minnesota St, New Ulm, Minnesota, 56073, US
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799

The Archery Trade Association is the organization for manufacturers, retailers, distributors, sales representatives and others working in the archery and bowhunting industry. The ATA has served its members since 1953. We work to increase the recruitment and retention of new, current and once-active archers and bowhunters. We are the driving force in defending, educating, and lobbying for the greater good of the industry and sport. We preserve and promote archery and bowhunting’s rich heritage to ensure active consumer participation, and successful manufacturing and retailing for generations to come. The organization also owns and operates the ATA Trade Show, the archery and bowhunting industry's largest and longest-running trade show worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adidas.jpeg
adidas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archery-trade-association.jpeg
Archery Trade Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
adidas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Archery Trade Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for adidas in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archery Trade Association in 2026.

Incident History — adidas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

adidas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Archery Trade Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archery Trade Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adidas.jpeg
adidas
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archery-trade-association.jpeg
Archery Trade Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Archery Trade Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to adidas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

adidas company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Archery Trade Association company has not reported any.

In the current year, Archery Trade Association company and adidas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

adidas company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Archery Trade Association company has not reported such incidents publicly.

adidas company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Archery Trade Association company has not reported such incidents publicly.

adidas company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Archery Trade Association company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither adidas company nor Archery Trade Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither adidas company nor Archery Trade Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

adidas company employs more people globally than Archery Trade Association company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither adidas nor Archery Trade Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H