Abbey Company Cyber Security Posture
abbey.comAbbey National plc is the 6th biggest UK bank with 705 branches under the Abbey brand. It also uses the Cahoot and since September 2008, the Bradford and Bingley savings brands. Subsidiary banks include Cater Allen Limited. Since 2004 Abbey has been part of the Santander group. Santander is the largest Eurozone Financial Services company. Recent Santander acquisitions include UK Bank Alliance and Leicester.
Abbey Company Details
abbey
10,001+ employees
0
522
Banking
abbey.com
Scan still pending
ABB_2275645
In-progress
Abbey Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Abbey Global Score.png)
Abbey Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Abbey Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Abbey Company Subsidiaries
Abbey National plc is the 6th biggest UK bank with 705 branches under the Abbey brand. It also uses the Cahoot and since September 2008, the Bradford and Bingley savings brands. Subsidiary banks include Cater Allen Limited. Since 2004 Abbey has been part of the Santander group. Santander is the largest Eurozone Financial Services company. Recent Santander acquisitions include UK Bank Alliance and Leicester.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Abbey Cyber Security News
Kyriba Relies on Threat Intelligence to Grow and Protect Their Business
Kyriba's priorities for cybersecurity include protecting its clients' financial data and operations against ransomware, exfiltration, downtime, and revenueย ...
US, UK, Australia sanction Russian cyber firm Zservers over ransomware attacks
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia jointly imposed sanctions on the Russian cyber company Zservers for its role inย ...
2025: Students Earn Academic Honors for the Fall 2024 Semester at SUNY Canton
The college offers three different awards recognizing student academic excellence during a single semester of study. To earn a spot on theย ...
Nightsleeper: Could a cyber hack derail a train in real life?
Nick Leather's high-octane six-part series follows a runaway sleeper train full of passengers which has been "hack-jacked" in a cyber attack andย ...
PH, US, Japan vow cooperation to enhance cyber, digital resilience
The Philippines has agreed to collaborate with the United States and Japan to enhance the nation's cyber and digital resilience.
Nightsleeper Ending Explained: Who Was the Driver?
Abby's mentor Paul โPevโ Peveril (David Threlfall) orchestrated the whole operation. The ex-NCSC employee was the Heart of Britain's hackjacker.
Nightsleeper: Meet the cast of the BBC thriller series, including Harry Potter and Downton Abbey stars
Nightsleeper is a must-watch thanks to its gripping plot, and immensely talented cast, which includes Harry Potter, Downton Abbey and Peaky Blinders stars.
Nightsleeper star responds to shocking Abby revelation in episode 4
Nightsleeper star Gabriel Howell reacts to a shocking episode 4 twist, which sees suspicion fall on Abby Aysgarth in the train hackjacking.
Security Wise safeguards Shrewsburyโs past with wireless fire system at Abbey Station
Security Wise has successfully installed a state-of-the-art wireless fire alarm system at the historic Abbey Station Visitor Centre.
Abbey Similar Companies
Yapฤฑ Kredi
Yapฤฑ Kredi has been sustainably strengthening its market positioning in the sector since its establishment in 1944 through a customer-centric approach and focus on innovation. Yapฤฑ Kredi is the 3rd largest private bank in Turkey with total assets worth TL 411 billion as of the end of 2019. Constantl
Regions Bank
Regions Financial Corporation is a member of the S&P 500 Index and is one of the nationโs largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, and mortgage products and services. Regions serves customers across the South, Midwest and Texas, and through its subsidiary
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd. ๅฏ้ฆ้ๆง
ไปฅใๆ็บไบๆดฒไธๆต็้่ๆฉๆงใ็บ็ผๅฑ้กๆฏ็ๅฏ้ฆ้ๆง๏ผๆไธไธป่ฆๅญๅ ฌๅธๅ ๆฌๅฏ้ฆไบบๅฃฝใๅฐๅๅฏ้ฆ้่กใๅฏ้ฆ้่ก(้ฆๆธฏ)ใๅฏ้ฆ่ฏไธ้่กใๅฏ้ฆ็ข้ชใๅฏ้ฆ่ญๅธๅๅฏ้ฆๆไฟก็ญ๏ผๆๆๆๅฎๆดๅคๅ ็้่็ขๅ่ๆๅ๏ผ็ถ็็ธพๆ่็ผ๏ผไฝๅฑ ๅธๅ ด้ ๅฐๅฐไฝใๅฏ้ฆ้ๆงๆทฑ่ๅฐ็ฃ้พ60ๅนด๏ผไปฅใๆญฃๅๅ้ ๆๅฐฑๅฏ่ฝโขใ็บๅ็็ๅฟต๏ผ่ดๅไปฅๆญฃๅ็ๅ้ๅๅ จๆนไฝ็้่ๆๅ๏ผๆฏๆไบบๅ่ฟฝๅฐ็พๅฅฝๆชไพใ ๆช่ณ2024ๅนดๅบ๏ผๅฏ้ฆ้ๆง็ธฝ่ณ็ข้12ๅ 673ๅๅ ๏ผ็บๅฐ็ฃ็ธฝ่ณ็ข็ฌฌไบๅคงใๅธๅผ็ฌฌไธๅคง้่ๆง่กๅ ฌๅธ๏ผ 2024ๅนด็จ ๅพๆทจๅฉ็บ1508.20ๅๅ ๏ผๆฏ่ก็้ค(EPS)10.77ๅ ใๅฏ้ฆ้ๆงๅทฒ้ฃ็บ16ๅนดๆฆฎ็ปๅฐ็ฃ้ๆงๆฅญๆฏ่ก็้ค็ฒๅฉ็ใๅฏ้ฆ้ๆงๅๅญๅ ฌๅธๅช็ฐ็ๆฐธ็บ็ถ็่กจ็พ
Nonghyup Bank
Nonghyup Bank is a banking company based out of 120 Tongil-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, South Korea. Show more Show less
Kotak Mahindra Bank
About Kotak Mahindra Group: Established in 1985, the Kotak Mahindra Group is one of Indiaโs leading financial services conglomerates. In February 2003, Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. (KMFL), the Groupโs flagship company, received a banking license from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). With this, KMF
VakฤฑfBank
1954 yฤฑlฤฑnda, vakฤฑf kaynaklarฤฑnฤฑ ekonomik kalkฤฑnmanฤฑn gereksinimleri doฤrultusunda en iyi biรงimde deฤerlendirmek amacฤฑyla kurulan VakฤฑfBank, o gรผnden bu yana รงaฤdaล bankacฤฑlฤฑk yรถntemleri ve uygulamalarฤฑyla Tรผrkiyeโnin tasarruf dรผzeyinin geliลim sรผrecine katkฤฑda bulunmaktadฤฑr. VakฤฑfBank; bรถlgesinin e
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Abbey CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Abbey has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Abbey has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Abbey National plc is the 6th biggest UK bank with 705 branches under the Abbey brand. It also uses the Cahoot and since September 2008, the Bradford and Bingley savings brands. Subsidiary banks include Cater Allen Limited. Since 2004 Abbey has been part of the Santander group. Santander is the largest Eurozone Financial Services company. Recent Santander acquisitions include UK Bank Alliance and Leicester..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
